Post by copper-telluride on Oct 9, 2012 13:02:56 GMT -5
After consulting with rocco, I've decided that Neutral Ends are going to be a thing. Basically, since it seems kind of unfair to punish the reader with a Bad End if they miss even one dialogue choice, I think that Bad Ends should be triggered by certain incorrect choices as opposed to just certain amounts of incorrect choices.
What I'd like to ask of all the writers is for each of them to come up with a neutral ending that doesn't involve anything as bad as the Bad End (like, for example, Ai just not meeting with her parents at all and continuing life as normal, Fumiko staying on as Hoshi's R&D specialist and becoming an actual cook instead of revolutionizing the scientific community, etc.), then once you do, you can decide which dialogue choices should then trigger the Bad End. Of course I'll need to check over it in the end, but you are the writers here, not me, so I'll mostly trust your judgment on the matter.
What I'd like to ask of all the writers is for each of them to come up with a neutral ending that doesn't involve anything as bad as the Bad End (like, for example, Ai just not meeting with her parents at all and continuing life as normal, Fumiko staying on as Hoshi's R&D specialist and becoming an actual cook instead of revolutionizing the scientific community, etc.), then once you do, you can decide which dialogue choices should then trigger the Bad End. Of course I'll need to check over it in the end, but you are the writers here, not me, so I'll mostly trust your judgment on the matter.